Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis

There argon near 5000 languages in use today, and from each one is rather dissimilar from many of the others. Many thinkers induce urged that large diversions in language ternion to large differences in experience and thought. They secure that each language embodies a worldview, which speakers of incompatible languages think about the world in quite opposite ways. At set-back I didnt really still what was being said, and I was really against it, solely after asking myself, really? cognize a divers(prenominal) amount of wrangling to describe things would allow us to repair understand and communicate, interesting than as we started the comment activity it became clear to me.Then immediately I started making connections to friends of mines form other alien countries. Sometimes we have difficulties explain things to each other, things that are often the same, but because of where hes from and the way their communication methods (Grammar, metaphors, Pragmatics, Semantics , Lexicon) are structured makes it difficult, to understand him being Im form a different part of the world, compresseding a different form of communication method, with a different set of rules.Form what I have take away and understand the virtually important discussions of the lingual relativity hypothesis have concentrate on grammar and lexicon which seem to be the most valid in my opinion. Why? Im guessing it have something to do with the way we talk, and the influence it have on a lot of how much we understand, establish on our vocabulary choices and makeup. For example a typical word order whitethorn vary in English the putting surface order is subject, verb, and object.In Japanese it is subject, object, and verb, and in Latin several different spin (word order). Languages freighter differ in whether they make a distinction between intransitive verbs and adjectives thither are many subtler sorts of grammatical difference as well. Grammar here does not mean the grammar w e learned in grammar school, but the syntactic structure of a language in the sense that grammar contains a set of rules that do-nothing generate all and only the sentences of a given language.