A Jury of Our Fears

In the abundance of crimes in todays society, the plurality put their fate on the hands of a selected group of people, who be expected to give justice onto whatever crime has been committed.These groups of people merchant ship be considered the most crucial part of the criminal justice remains of the nation the finish-making body known as the venire. But lately, instead of saving justice to the deserving ones, these juries have been feargond to come up with faulty decisions and undependable judgments.The criminal justice system has been put to question, all thanks to the incompetency of these juries who doesnt pay much attention on their jobs. These juries are so confident that they can give the right decision by entirely looking at the people in question, and not by innate analysis and investigations.In Rothwaxs essay regarding these juries, he stated that the rhetoric that idealizes the gore and the reality of its operation are in conflict. This promoter that the jurie s arent performing the federal agency they are supposed to perform, and this jeopardizes the judiciary system of the nation. Initially, the definition of what a jury is should be right on established.According to Rothwax, a jury is 12-man team make up of able-bodied, fair-minded people who mediates between the government and the defendant or the incriminate individual. In their hands lies the power on how the solecism will be decided, and usually, what they decided on becomes the conclusion for the case.But lately, many lawyers and judges pointed out that these trials by jury are often decided out of randomness, and is somewhat farthermost from what should be a highly-judicial practice of deciding on what will top to the accused. instead of deeply analyzing these cases, the jury often acquits those who are obviously felonious defendants because of irrelevant matters.They are also unable to reach a finding of fact in cases which seemed to be very overwhelming, therefrom p roving their incompetence in what they do. Instead of arriving to well-thought of decisions, they often rely on hints or trends, like bodily gestures of the defendant, as well as their physical looks and age.One solution being suggested was on removing the decision making body which is the jury. But this is seen impossible because of the fact that the nation has relied on the jury system of bringing justice, thats why Rothwax proposes several tweaks in the underway judicial system of today. These may be a study change or a minor adjustment, but hopefully, these things could solve the current problems being faced by the judicial system today.One solution could be sharing the Jury duty. This does not limit the legitimate jury choices, since trials are often hindered because of jury who doesnt show up in essential court hearings. With an increased number of choices, the faster the cases could be processed. This opens the opening for having new(prenominal) people act as jury, like d octors, clergymen, professionals, and so much more.Handpicking a jury for the case shouldnt also be allowed. This is because defendants who have a large chance of getting convicted can choose some naive jurors who could cloud up the decision making for the case. In our nations system for selecting the jury, the job is often left with the defense side. This opens the possibility for having jurors which are poor evaluators of facts, thus jeopardizing the way the case will be decided.Another would be about abolishing the unanimous verdict being given by the jury. This is to rule out the possibility of having the decision revoke just because of a single suffrage.The sense of take about what will be the decision will be lost, as it will still be stopped by a throw up vote, which could mean that the person who had another may have not properly review the case or evidences. Surely, there are reasons or instances that these jury takes into consideration about the decision. But with say a 11-1 vote, the single vote may be a negligible number in deciding.Foolish technicalities should also be removed when coming with the right decision by means of a jury. This could just hinder the proceedings of the case, or totally resign the result of the case.This is because of the fact that some technicalities which are clearly irrelevant to the case could be used to delay the processing of a case, thus loose those guilty of their crimes plenty of times to hide possible evidences that could lead to firmness the case. All over the country, some courts have shown signs that people sometimes figure to foolish technicalities to delay the proceedings of the case to think of a way for him not to get convicted.