Leadership order

NO. I resist with him since unity should not assume a problem while hoping that solutions impart be found after sometime. The partnership had grown from having 2 to 27 people in one town and has spread into three make out towns. The partnership be a law firm has increased the publication of attorneys to 18 resulting into increased occur of cases being handled by the firm, increased number of employees and increased number of clients. Hiring a General Manager-operations (G.M) was intended to assist in promotion of production in the go with. Instead he was sending extraneous clients without accepting the liabilities. Further efforts showed be put into place into retain them as swell up as bring back those who had al desexualize left.These clients shed been with the connection for a long time and the firm could not afford emit because of a mistake of one individual. This is because the firm was likely to face problems strike among them being, loss of jobs for its employees as a result of reduced number of clients. additionally, the company entrust not be able to run its sidereal day to day business since there will be reduced income. The partners should insist on meeting the clients and ask them to return to their firm since they k crude their services. The partners should first deliberate on the issue of retaining the general manager because he was not result oriented.The G.M-operations overstepped is recognise and instead of improving the node relations, expanding the customer base as well as enhancing the relations with the local communities he severed both the customer and client relations. The top management team should move truly turbulent and replace the general manager immediately so as to save up the company. Power sharing is a very important aspect of leaders since, the problems facing the junior staff, decision- do and practiceation is increased. De-concentration of power also promotes efficiency and specialty since the leaders i nvolved will have few responsibilities to shoulder and and then they will perform their duties to the maximum for the advantage of the multitude.Leadership is not approximately directing and guiding people to do a particular line of work and is an issue where a group member influences the rest of the group to accomplish an objective. A leader should direct the organization towards greater sleaze and coherence (Schriesheim, Chester A. 221-228, Lewin, K, LIippit, R and White R.K. 271-301). The authority that a leader possesses should be directed to accomplishment of the groups goal. Good leadership should be one that makes the pursuit and the junior staff desire to achieve higher goals rather than to precisely ride over the juniors.The manner and approach in which an individual provides direction, implement plans and motivate people normally defines the leadership expression his/her leadership style. A General Manager-operations of a fast growing firm should be one not limi ted to a specific leadership style. He should but be ready to employ all styles depending on the situation. Participatory/ republican leadership style which involves one or more members of the group in making decisions has been found to be very appropriate. This style should have worked very well since the G.M-operation was new in the legal firm as he had come from insurance company where he had worked for long.Instead of spending a lot of time of learning about the organization, its members and books of account he would have instead involved the longest serving employees in decision making. This style would allow members to own the decisions reached upon since the were part of their generation. This leadership style is so say in individuals who are cooperative, dedicated and team players as well as solely motivated to achieve tangible results not for their benefit but that of the larger firm. However, since a formal organization is prone to have employees of dissimilar skills, p ersonalities and temperaments, a leader should be well conversant with all leadership styles which include authoritarian/autocratic, participative/democratic and delegative/free reign and be ready to use any of them alternately depending on the surrounding circumstanceAlthough I have used all the leadership styles very successfully the most pronounced style that I posses is autocratic/authoritarian which I gift without a lot of struggle .With this style I prefer being a leader of newly formed group member of whom giving directions and receiving advice is never a problem. I also prefer leading new team members since I derive a lot of pleasure in showing off my capacities. It also reduces deliberation time and decision making since the members are rarely consulted and decision making is top down. However, I will never prefer leading a group composed of extremely skilled and knowledgeable members since they have a potential of critiquing my style. They may look participation in dec ision-making as well as delegation of duties. Additionally since I desire being recognized as a oldtimer I will rather be a leader for an inexperient group.References Schriesheim, Chester A. The Great High Consideration High initiating structureLeadership romance Evidence on its generalizability. The journal of socialPsychology, April 1982, 116, pp 221-228Mind tools Leadership styles, apply the right one for your situation.Accessed online onLewin, K, LIippit, R and White R.K. Patterns of aggressive conduct in experimentallyCreated social climates. Journals of social psychology 1999, 10, 271-301